Follow Us


January 6, 2009

I'm tired of the Yankees

I’ve had some time to think about this next statement, but even at the risk of coming across like a thirteen year-old with a Myspace page…I’ll say it.

I hate the New York Yankees.

Oh sure, I’ve talked before about how much I would like to visit Monument Park. I’ve even sung the praises of Yankee great Ron Guidry by comparing him (quite favorably I might add) to Sandy Koufax. But all their history and the legacy of the pinstripes aside, I can’t get behind their off-season signings.

Hell, I know Yankees FANS who can’t argue that the signings of C.C. Sabathia, A.J. Burnett and, most recently, Mark Teixeira AREN’T good for the game.

All that said, I do sleep better knowing that (A) they were not invited to the annual Frank Caliendo promo fest Major League Baseball calls the “playoffs” and (B) they haven’t won a World Series since BEFORE the Twin Towers were rubble.

I guess at the end of it all, I can take solace in the fact that we’ve seen this movie before…25 years ago.

The “Bronx Bombers” OWNED baseball in the late 70s. They averaged 98 wins from 1976 to 1980 and took home two world championships. Owner George Steinbrenner was at his most colorful. He hired and fired Billy Martin twice (he’d make three more stints as manager throughout the 80s) and brought players in left and right to capture the pennant.

Reggie Jackson, Catfish Hunter and Goose Gossage were all brought in to win.

And they did.

In the decade following, Steinbrenner again opened up his wallet to buy some hardware. He brought in Dave Winfield, Rickey Henderson and Don Baylor to round out a lineup already chock full of established stars like Guidry, Willie Randolph, Graig Nettles and a certain up and coming first baseman.

Steve Balboni.

Problem is…this didn’t work. The Yankees went from dominating the American League to going twelve straight years of NOT making the playoffs…their longest such streak since BEFORE Babe Ruth came over from BeanTown.

Apparently, you can’t buy chemistry and I’m hopeful that my friend Nick Underhill was right when he wrote THIS last month. Sure, he recanted his statement eleven days later…but I’m sticking to my guns.

Now, to think I’m going to spend the next dozen (or more…probably many more) paragraphs trumpeting Balboni’s career would be insane. Granted, his lifetime numbers of .229, 181 homeruns and 495 RBIs are as rotund as he was, but it’s the Lou Gehrig to Balboni’s Wally Pipp that I’m excited about.

Don Mattingly.

I know what you’re thinking…did this guy lose his mind? He must’ve just got done watching the Cheers finale (that’s a 1993 reference, gang), because “Donnie Baseball” hasn’t been relevant since BEFORE the strike of 1994.

How did I go from HATING the Yankees to writing about, arguably, one of their most popular players?

I’ll tell ya.

Like most of the world, I was enamored with Mattingly when he hit the scene. I had his 1984 Donruss rookie card encased in Lucite and thought I was witnessing the second coming.

That being said, I’m not so sure we weren’t.

During a six-year run beginning in 1984, Mattingly averaged 26 home runs, 114 RBIs and a .327 batting average. No player during that stretch had more RBI than Mattingly's 684, while only Hall of Famer Wade Boggs (1,269) had more hits than Mattingly's 1,219.

That six-year peak (from 1984 to 1989) is clearly one of the best of his generation and overall, his brief career stacks up with some others in the Hall.

Let’s compare him with a recently inducted Hall of Famer and YOU explain to ME why Mattingly can’t get more than 28 percent of the vote. Matter of fact, if someone can tell me how less than TEN percent of the voters in 2007 thought Mattingly was Hall worthy…I’m waiting.

So, let’s compare!

HALL CANDIDATE A played in only 1785 games at the major league level. However, in that short career…he notched 2153 hits, 222 homeruns and 1099 RBI.

Known primarily as a contact guy, this player had a career batting average of .307 and an on base percentage of .358. Seven times, this player finished in the top ten in hits and five times, he was in the top ten in batting average…leading the league only once. He had a stretch of five out of six years, where he finished in the top five in RBI.

Let’s look at the trophy case.

HALL CANDIDATE A was once a league MVP and four straight years, he finished in the top ten in voting. He was an All-Star six times and had a surprisingly spectacular glove, bringing home the Gold Glove at his position in nine out of ten seasons.

As I’ve said before, post season accolades can make you or break you. In this player’s career…he had a career post season batting average of .417.

Now…let’s check out the resume of HALL CANDIDATE B by using the same EXACT criteria. Matter of fact, I’m going to cut and paste the preceding and make the appropriate changes.

Here we go.

HALL CANDIDATE B played in only 1783 games at the major league level. However, in that short career…he notched 2304 hits, 207 homeruns and 1085 RBI.

Like HALL CANDIDATE A, HALL CANDIDATE B was also known as a contact guy. He had a career batting average of .318 and an on base percentage of .360. Ten times, this player finished in the top ten in hits and seven times, he was in the top ten in batting average…leading the league once. Only twice did he finish in the top five in RBI.

Let’s look at the trophy case.

HALL CANDIDATE B was never a league MVP, but there was a stretch where nine times in eleven years, he finished in the top ten in voting. He was an All-Star ten straight years and while he was heralded as having a spectacular glove, he was only golden six times.

Again, as I’ve said before, you have to look at post season accolades. In this player’s career…he had a career post season batting average of .309.

Now, here’s the part where you can separate who is who.

HALL CANDIDATE B has two World Series rings in two chances and if you paid any attention in the first half of this post, you know that Mattingly has none.

So, who is HALL CANDIDATE B? It’s the very guy who gave Mattingly the moniker “Donnie Baseball” of course…Kirby Puckett.

Yeah, the same Kirby Puckett who went into the Hall in 2001...coincidently, both his and Mattingly’s first year on the ballot. 2001 also yielded the highest amount of support for Mattingly…28.2%.

"I don't think I'm a Hall of Famer," Mattingly told Newsday last year. "I don't think I have the numbers. Part of it is longevity, and I wasn't able to do that and do the things that I did early in my career."

Mattingly is a modest, modest man.

If his numbers show anything it’s that he HAS the numbers. As I’ve shown, his numbers are on par with Kirby Puckett. Sure, neither had the longevity (both were forced out due to injury)...but there are a number of players in the Hall who played in LESS games.

If you’ve heard me sound off about Albert Belle…you know I think the longevity argument is flawed. On the flipside, I think some players play their way into the Hall by playing in TOO MANY games.

Simply put, the “longevity” argument is garbage and Mattingly is, again, being modest by bringing it up. But I get it, he’s not out there playing the “I’m a Hall of Famer” game like some players do...he’s allowing others to bang his drum.

And I guess that’s what I am doing…my personal feelings about the New York Yankees aside.

The Hall of Fame voting is revealed Monday, but if you’ve got something to say about Jim Rice, Andre Dawson or even Dale Murphy…I’d like to hear from you!

Drop me an email at and who knows…your words might just end up on this website!

***Note: Based on the "Is Don Mattingly a Hall of Famer" poll that was on the page...50% of you think he is.***

BallHype: hype it up!


David Allan said...

Hey, Love the points about Mattingly. Especially about longevity. But I am going to say no. Why you say? Well here is why Eddie Murray. IF you look at there 162 game averages, for hits, home runs, rbi's, BOP they are almost identical. Why wouldn't that make Mattingly a Hall of Famer you ask here is why. This case it is Longevity, after age 34 when Mattingly retired Murray compiled an additional 125 hr's, and 805 hits. Mattingly's power number after age 29 were as follow 5, 9, 14, 17, 6, 7. Name me a hall of fame first basemen that has a string of 6 years that sounds like that? Much like Jim Rice, who I have argued isn't even close, Mattingly falls short. Great stretch in the first 6 years sure, but his overall body of work isn't that good. This is baselball, the numbers don't lie.

Jesus said...


If you're just going to go by POWER numbers...Mattingly shouldn't even be brought up in the same conversation as Cooperstown.

However, much like Wade Boggs, we both know that his career wasn't built on knocking the ball out of the yard. Both of them were professional hitters and in Don's case...a pretty decent glove as well.

But I'll play the game...Rod Carew. His power numbers as a first baseman stunk. Sure, he had all those other intagibles, but chicks didn't dig him because of the long ball. Haha.

Just out of curiosity...what are your thoughts on Albert Belle?

David Allan said...

Jesus, I understand you power numbers points. But Murray had 805 hits after his 34th birthday. The year Mattingly retired. More than 1/3 of Mattingly's career total. Although .307 is impressive. 1,099 RBI's aren't considering his spot in the line up.
I don't see people running around screaming for Will Clark (who I personally love, but isn't a hall of famer either.)
As for Albert Belle, 1995 was the best single season I remember outside of a guy named Bonds. I think the Arguements for Joey are compelling and would love to do a little more of my own home work. The fact that he isn't on the ballot tells me that the BBWAA system is flawed, how can you not take seriously a guy that batted .295, average 37 round trippers and 120 rbi's over his ten year period as a regular major leaguer.

David Allan said...

On the Rod Carew points, 3000 hits punches your ticket. As well he was an 18 time all star, and a .328 average. I know you are arguing that I was talking power numbers. But I think Mattingly needs 3000 hits because he's short on the power numbers, he doesn't quite deliever enough for me to say he is hall worthy as a contact hitter. Harsh, but 2100 hits, well let be fair that puts him in the company of Larry Walker, (who's other career numbers are much better.) and Moises Alou, (who has better power numbers and a career average that is only 4 points lower). So the answer on Mattingly is still no.